The notion of love, in a romantic sense, often isn’t really very loving. In a romance people don’t usually love, they want something. Let me say that again: People don’t love, they want something. Sounds pretty harsh doesn’t it? But how many people do you know who actually love their romantic partner without strings – unconditionally? That’s what I call love.
On the other hand, aren’t most relationships based on a lot of judgment? We judge our partners and think they should change. Then we get mad at them, say and do hurtful things, withdraw, and in other ways try to manipulate and control them when our partners don’t do what we want. In other words most so-called “love” relationships are based on a trade-off: You give me what I want and I’ll be nice to you. Is that how love acts?
It seems to me that a more honest description of love than the mushy, mawkish, romantic notion people think of, is to look at the behavior of one who loves. The words, “I love you” are easy. The behavior demonstrating that? Well, that’s another matter. Which are you going to believe, the words or the actions?
Authentic, unconditional love looks different from the trade-off people call love. It seems pretty clear to me that when a person accepts another without judgment that’s love. There’s no desire to force or manipulate or coerce or change your date or partner in any way. You simply accept them as they are. There may not be the physical or sexual attraction to every person that we call romantic love, but when there’s acceptance I’d call that love. Then when that ineffable spark of romantic attraction lights up two lives, and it’s coupled with the kind of nonjudgmental acceptance I’m describing, that relationship is what I’d call true love. No strings. No judgments. Just acceptance and freedom for both.
What is it that keeps people from loving unconditionally? It’s always judgment isn’t it? We judge another person, think they should change, and then go about trying to make that change happen. And we’ll use just about any manipulative trick in our tool bag to do it – guilt, anger, revenge, silence, sarcasm, nearly anything. We often do this without even thinking much about what we’re doing. For many of us it’s simply using old habits we learned, for example: “If I get mad enough at him he won’t do that again!”
Since I’m saying judging is not love it may help to be really clear about what judgment is and is not. That question sometimes comes up. So let’s see if we can clarify that a bit.
First, selection is not judging. If you select pie over cake for dessert you’re not judging. You’re not saying the cake is bad or wrong or needs to change; you’re only saying pie is your preference. The same goes for a person. You can choose to be around Harry and not spend time with Ray, but that doesn’t mean you’re judging Ray. You simply see that you and Ray have personalities that don’t match. You don’t think Ray needs to change at all.
Second, description is also not judging. Joe may be 6’5” and you call him tall. That’s not a judgment, just a description. Or he may get very angry. His face is red and the arteries in his neck are popping and he’s yelling. To say he’s angry isn’t a judgment either. It’s just a description.
Judging is this: When you think someone should change you’re judging. You’ve decided that a person should not be the way they are. It’s as simple as that. If you don’t think they need to change you’re accepting them as they are. That’s love. It’s just unconditionally allowing them to be the way they are. Without adding our ideas to the way the Universe should be, we don’t ever need to judge anyone in a moralistic sense, saying they’re bad or wrong because of their behavior. How do we know how they should be? Reality is that they are just as they are. Period.
To use the example of Joe above, let’s say Joe is not only angry but he’s angry at you. If you’re saying, “Joe is angry at me,” you’re describing him. If you’re saying, “Joe is angry at me and he shouldn’t be,” you’re judging. The “shouldn’t be” is where judgment has stepped in.
Let’s say Joe is angry at you and blaming you for something you didn’t do. You might feel pretty righteous about judging him – saying he shouldn’t be angry at you. After all, he’s got his facts wrong. But you’ve still judged him, and this is where understanding judgment gets a little tricky. If we stay with Joe’s anger, and don’t add our interpretation or story to it, we simply see that Joe is mad. When we think we know he’s wrong and should not be angry, that’s when we’ve judged. We’ve come in at that moment with our beliefs and certainties and applied them to Joe. We’re saying, “I know how Joe should be and it’s not this way.” But do we really know? All we really need to see is that he appears angry. That’s reality. Reality is just “what is”, without our opinion, interpretation or judgment.
Now, it may sound like I’m being moralistic and saying it’s not nice to judge someone. I’m not saying that. This has nothing to do with our ideas of morality. What I’m saying is that judgment hurts me, first of all, and it also hurts my relationships. It doesn’t work. It doesn’t bring relationships closer. A simple way to notice when you’re judging is this: It never feels good inside. Even a slight judgment brings a subtle, suffering. There’s a tension, a hot flash in the gut, a tightening and contraction – some feeling of distress.
When there’s no judgment there’s simply seeing – as a baby sees, or a dog. There’s no opinion, no interpretation, no thought in you that the person needs to change or make corrections. The very instant we judge our date or partner what’s our next response? We want to change them don’t we? Manipulating and controlling is not love.
We’re in the trade-off mode again. We’re thinking, “If I can get you to change and be who I want you to be I’ll be happy.” In that mode we’ll do pretty much whatever it takes to force that change. We’ll use anger, withdrawal, hitting the person in their weakest, most vulnerable spot – almost any kind of control or manipulation to get what we want. Notice that – we want to get what we want. Is that love? I don’t think so.
Copyright © 2006 Chuck Custer